Philipp Osterwalder — CEO @ 1LIMS | Empowering 85+ Analytical Lab Teams to triple Sample Throughput, Achieve Effortless Compliance, and Slash Quality Costs by 45% — All Without Paper or Excel – in Just 90 Days | #TheDigitalLabGuy
CEO @ 1LIMS | Empowering 85+ Analytical Lab Teams to triple Sample Throughput, Achieve Effortless Compliance, and Slash Quality Costs by 45% — All Without Paper or Excel – in Just 90 Days | #TheDigitalLabGuy
Philipp Osterwalder ranks #195 of 14,983 LinkedIn creators in Computer Software, and is a standout voice in Switzerland. They have 11.2K followers and published 50 posts in the last 30 days at a 1.5% average engagement rate.
- 11.2K followers
- 50 posts / 30d
- 1.5% avg engagement
- — follower growth / 30d
The roast
Philipp Osterwalder posted 50 times in a month, which is the exact threshold at which a CEO stops running a lab automation company and starts acting like a high-functioning digital hostage. He claims he’s eliminating spreadsheets, yet he’s the only person in Switzerland still logging his own social media impressions like a bored teenager in a basement.
About Philipp
I transform analytical laboratory teams into stress-free, high-performance environments. From a young age, I’ve been fascinated by the intersection of innovation and efficiency. As a lab technician and environmental engineer passionate about lab technology and sustainable solutions, my journey into the world of lab automation started. My vision of guiding lab teams away from manual processes and endless spreadsheets led me to co-found 1LIMS in 2017. Since then, we’ve helped over 50 lab teams worldwide increase their throughput, easily navigate audits, and seamlessly integrate cutting-edge technology into their IT ecosystems. My work revolves around a simple yet powerful principle: True solutions come from deeply understanding the problem. With this philosophy and a data-driven approach, I lead projects that deliver real, measurable impact. Beyond my role as CEO at 1LIMS, I’ve contributed to groundbreaking projects like Aurora, an intelligent lighting system for sustainable agriculture, and the SWAG System, a hydroponic solution inspired by space exploration technology. These projects reflect my commitment to work interdisciplinaryly and leveraging technology to create a more sustainable future. My values? Innovation, knowledge sharing, and authenticity. I believe in leading by example and inspiring others to drive meaningful, lasting change. When I’m not busy helping labs embrace the future, I can be found guest lecturing, exploring the outdoors, practicing Karate, or listening to audiobooks on the latest trends in technology and Eastern wisdom. Interested in connecting? Let’s collaborate and tackle the next big challenge in lab digitalization together!
Highlights
- Top 1% in Computer Software — Ranked #36 of 4267 creators
- Consistent Creator — 50 posts in 30d · top 5%
- Top 5% in Switzerland — Ranked #8 of 276 creators
- High Impact — 164 avg engagements per post · top 25%
Recent posts
Stop fixing your broken lab processes quietly. If your team is working overtime to bridge the gap between disconnected systems, management will never see the problem, and they definitely won't fund the solution. Gerard Ipskamp from Manufacturing Operations Management Institute (MOMi), a consultant with 20+ years of LIMS implementation experience, gave the best piece of advice on this in our new report: "Find the problem and don't solve it. Make it visible instead. Once the right people feel it, the budget conversation takes care of itself." He also noted that too many projects fail beca
14 reactions · 4 comments · 7 reposts
If your QC lab needs 2 weeks to prepare for an audit, you have a documentation problem. Not an audit problem. Here's what "2 weeks of prep" actually looks like: Week 1: → Find all SOPs and check the version numbers → Track down calibration certificates that should have been filed in January → Cross-reference batch records with test results → Discover three things that were never formally closed Week 2: → Retrospectively fill in what should have been captured live → Write the CAPAs that should have been written when deviations happened → Pray nobody asks about the period between March and
9 reactions · 1 comments · 1 reposts
Adding a 15-step manual checklist after a failed batch is just corporate anxiety disguised as progress, not real quality improvement. https://lnkd.in/eGcAAyWm
0 reactions · 0 comments · 0 reposts