Kishalaya Mukhopadhyay — Marketing Data Science | Analytics | Growth | Marketing - Science, Measurement & Effectiveness | Proud Cat Parent
Marketing Data Science | Analytics | Growth | Marketing - Science, Measurement & Effectiveness | Proud Cat Parent
Kishalaya Mukhopadhyay ranks #546 of 19,190 LinkedIn creators in Marketing & Advertising, and is a standout voice in India. They have 27.5K followers and published 40 posts in the last 30 days at a 0.1% average engagement rate.
- 27.5K followers
- 40 posts / 30d
- 0.1% avg engagement
- 186 follower growth / 30d
The roast
Kishalaya writes 43 posts a month to convince us he understands marketing measurement, yet his 0.19% engagement rate proves he’s the only person in the industry who can spend $1 million a month without actually reaching a human being. He’s a causal inference expert who somehow can’t figure out why nobody cares what he has to say.
About Kishalaya
Nearly a decade in marketing, and the journey has been a deliberate one — starting in branding and creative, moving through SEO and performance marketing, and arriving in recent years at marketing measurement, causal inference, and data science. Having sat on every side of the marketing table, I've developed an appreciation for both the creative and business dimensions of advertising, alongside the quantitative capability to measure its true impact. That combination — understanding what makes a campaign compelling and being able to rigorously evaluate whether it worked — is what I find most useful to the clients and teams I work with. Most of my current work is focused on making marketing measurement more rigorous — closing the gap between what gets credited and what actually drove the result. That means moving beyond standard attribution and into methods that can isolate true causal impact: Marketing Mix Modelling, geo-experimentation, incrementality testing, and causal inference frameworks applied to real media budgets. The goal is always the same: transform the data into something that leads to a clear, confident business decision. I've managed over $1M in monthly ad spend across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and Bing — across different sectors and geographies. That hands-on experience across the full performance marketing stack is what keeps the measurement work grounded in commercial reality. Core areas: Marketing Measurement & Effectiveness — MMM (Meridian, Robyn, PyMC, LightweightMMM), media mix optimisation, budget allocationCausal Inference & Experimentation — GeoLift, CausalImpact, CausalPy, DiD, Synthetic Controls, ITSA, RDDPerformance Marketing — Google Ads, Meta, Bing, LinkedIn, YouTube — strategy through to executionAnalytics & BI — Python, SQL, BigQuery, Looker Studio, Power BI I write regularly on marketing measurement and growth data science — the gap between what the industry claims to measure and what it actually measures is still wide, and worth talking about honestly.
Highlights
- Consistent Creator — 36 posts in 30d · top 5%
- Big Audience — 27,479 followers · top 5%
- Top 10% in India — Ranked #43 of 752 creators
- Top 10% in Marketing & Advertising — Ranked #102 of 1094 creators
Recent posts
There I said it - for most marketing teams, especially in midmarket category, the biggest source of frustration is not poor attribution models. Or lack of MMMs or incrementality. It much further upstream. It's the lack of a unified data source, like datawarehouses eg: BigQuery. This is the most fundamental step. More sophisticated analyses, econometric modeling, causality, incrementality - all this comes afterwards. I don't think I'd be wrong to say that over 80% of midmarket brands still don't have a unified data source. If anyone has any more concrete number on that, would love to hear
34 reactions · 11 comments · 1 reposts
There I said it - for most marketing teams, especially in midmarket category, the biggest source of frustration is not poor attribution models. Or lack of MMMs or incrementality. It much further upstream. It's the lack of a unified data source, like datawarehouses eg: BigQuery. This is the most fundamental step. More sophisticated analyses, econometric modeling, causality, incrementality - all this comes afterwards. I don't think I'd be wrong to say that over 80% of midmarket brands still don't have a unified data source. If anyone has any more concrete number on that, would love to hear
34 reactions · 11 comments · 1 reposts
Merely hours into its launch and Fable 5 is already getting things wrong 🤣 So, what's new? And this was using Max effort in Fable 5!! On a serious note, stop taking advice on alleged differential capabilities of the Claude models seriously. Most of that is ill-informed. #Claude #AI
3 reactions · 0 comments · 0 reposts